A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

A. In misunderstanding of facts, misunderstanding of legal principles 1) 1, 2017 High Order 2416, which was decided in the first instance judgment, the Defendant, in response to the Defendant’s refusal to leave the victim AH’s demand, was a victim of assaulting the victim’s body, and did not comply with the victim’s demand to leave. However, the first instance court convicted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending of facts.

2) The Defendant, 2017, 884, 2017, 300, 300, 2017, 2017, 884, 300, 300, 300, 300, was convicted of this part of the facts charged, and there was an error of misunderstanding of facts and of misapprehending of legal principles.

B. At the time of each crime committed in the judgment of the first and second instance, the Defendant was in a state of having no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to polar disorder.

(c)

The sentencing of the court below 1, 2, and 3 is too unreasonable.

(1) The grounds for appeal are examined to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed, and no separate decision shall be made on the assertion that is not entirely indicated in the appellate brief).

2. Determination

A. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.

The first, second, and third court sentenced the defendant to a separate trial for the defendant under the name of 444, 1760, 1983, 201, 2236, 2383, 2416, 2510, 2517, 3255, 2017, 883, 884, 2017, and the court below sentenced the defendant to a separate trial for the defendant. The defendant filed each appeal against the judgment of the court below against the first, second, and third court. The court also decided to hold a joint trial for the above appeal cases.