According to the records, since the defendant alleged only unfair sentencing in the court below as the ground for appeal, the defendant was in a state of mental and physical disability, which was only raised in the court of final appeal.

All of the arguments that there is a misapprehension of the legal principles as to collection or collection cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

Furthermore, in light of the record, the lower court cannot be deemed to have erred as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Meanwhile, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a lower sentence was imposed on the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.