사해행위취소 등
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is to correct or add the following matters to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the statement of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the statement of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to supplementing the judgment of the defendant on the defendant’s assertion, this is to be cited
2. The phrase “2012Gahap728” in the first instance court No. 3 of the first instance court’s decision No. 3, the phrase “2012Gahap7278”, the phrase “land stated in the attached list No. 3,” the phrase “real estate listed in the attached list No. 8,” the phrase “the business security deposit” of No. 5, the phrase “this court” of No. 6, respectively, shall be read as “the court of the first instance,” and the phrase “No. 11” in the column of No. 4, and the phrase “No. 9-1 through No. 3” in the front of No. 3 through No. 7, the phrase “No. 4,” as “No. 16.”
3.Supplementary decisions shall be corrected and supplemented in full in accordance with paragraph 16(c) of Part 4 of the decision of the court of first instance as follows:
According to the statements in the health account statement, Gap evidence No. 9-1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 3 through 7 as to this case, as a result of the confirmation by the creditor (the plaintiff) on the application form for provisional attachment against Eul around September 22, 2012, which submitted by the plaintiff as the preserved right, and the written application for provisional attachment attached thereto, in order to investigate the debtor's property, the debtor has no specific property other than the attached list and bears a large amount of debts." The statement in the application form for provisional attachment attached to the provisional attachment of real estate concerning the land of this case prepared around July 2012 by designating the above loan claim as the preserved right and being prepared around July 2012 by the debtor's owner on the registry at the debtor's domicile was established as a collateral security as can be known at the time of the debtor's registry at the debtor's address, and there was a collateral security twice.
2.3.