If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant served as a victim B (n, 24 years of age) and a family member with the past workplace.

1. No person, such as an over-to-face telephone, shall cause another person to talk by making a phone call, text message, letter, e-mail, electronic document, etc. several times without good cause;

On April 26, 2019, the Defendant moved out and well-known from Seoul Buddhist District on April 16, 2019 to the cell phone of the victim’s cell phone.

In the event of being employed as an employee, the victim was bullyingd by making a call, etc. more than seven times from that time, including sending a text message, “Is to withhold a lawsuit,” and then sending from that time to June 22, 2019, by making the phone call, etc. more than seven times in total, such as the one in the List of Crimes No. 1.

2. No person shall continuously attempt access against the explicit will of the other party to meet or teach him/her by demanding access or repeated acts, such as complying with, complying with, or waiting for such act.

On May 5, 2019, around 00:17, the Defendant found the victim's house located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and repeated the Defendant's act of continuously attempting to approach more than six times against the victim's express will, as shown in attached Table 2, from that time until November 1, 2019, including that "to have only a short-term motor vehicle, we weed, or drink."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of each investigation report (including the content of suspect calls) on text messages to statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act and provisions of Article 3 (1) 40 and 41 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Options of respective fines) concerning the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to have been agreed upon by the defendant to commit the crime of death against the victim and to the effect that he/she only agreed to do so.