A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

1. At around March 22, 2014, Defendant A, at the main point of “E” located in “E” located in “E”, Defendant A, upon receiving a report of 112 that there was an assault incident between “F,” and Defendant A, expressed that the victim H of the police officer affiliated with the Ku Government Police Station G District G District called “this spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, and the spath, the spath, the spath, the spath, and the spath, the victim exceeded the floor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the 112 reported site measures, etc., and at the same time, the Defendant was in the right kne kne kne with which the number of treatment days is unknown.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), Defendant B reported that the police officer H’s remarks A with the Defendant’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers her her

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the 112 reported site measures by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police statement to F, J, and K;

1. On-site photographs and standing photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (victim’s hearing report), investigation report (report on hearing statements made by the persons concerned);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) - Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Commercial concurrence - Defendant A: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment - Defendant A: Imprisonment - Defendant B: Selection of fine;

1. Detention in a workhouse - Defendant B: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution - Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The provisional payment order - Defendant B: the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.