If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

The defendant is a person who is the main employee B.

1. Around 14:00 on April 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) entered a structure; (b) entered the victim’s business store, using the main heat, in which the victim D was prepared to steal the corrected entrance in order to steal the property; and (c) went into the main store; and (d) intrudes the victim’s business store by using the main heat.

2. A thief, at the same time and place as above “1”, the Defendant stolen KRW 7,500,000 from a Raber, the key to the locker’s cash custody at the victim’s location, which was located at the location of the locker’s cash storage, into the victim’s store, using the Raber’s store located in the business place, KRW 7,50,000,000,000, KRW 53 (53,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,0000,000,000 won, and 932,000,000. On April 4, 200, the Defendant used the 197,000,000 won and 00,000 won and 0,000 won and 0,000 won and 0,000 won and 0.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the statutes on the screen screen by field photographs and CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.