교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who operates a bicycle.
On November 13, 2014, at around 18:30 on November 13, 2014, the Defendant crossinged the crosswalk of the front road C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, with bicycles.
At the time, the crosswalk signal at the time was changed to red signal at least, so in such a case, no driver of the vehicle shall drive the vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and obstacle on others, depending on the traffic situation of the road and the structure and performance of the vehicle, and shall make a safe report on the front-way traffic situation and prevent the accident in advance by driving the vehicle. When the bicycle driver crosses the road by using the crosswalk, he/she has the duty of care to walk the bicycle and walk the bicycle.
Nevertheless, under the above circumstances, the Defendant was negligent in crossing the crosswalk as it was, and the Defendant stopped in front of the crosswalk, but was faced with the front part of the D SP car running toward the transfer distance from the same orchard distance according to the vehicle straight signal.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim E (the 34-year-old driver), who is a driver of the spak vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the sprink requiring a one-day medical treatment, and damaged the spak vehicle to the unsprinked level of repair cost.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A traffic accident-related statement of E;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. A written diagnosis of injury;
1. The instant traffic accident, based on the determination of the issue of the insurance repair cost claim, is facing the victim's front side by the Defendant's bicycle side, and it seems that the shock was not significant in light of the situation, speed, etc. at the time, and there was no credit on the victim.
However, the victim stated that the diagnosis is necessary as the victim stated in the instant case.