When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 6, 2014, at around 22:05, the Defendant used a 'D' restaurant operated by Da-gu Daegu-gu B Victim C (year 38, South) to have a large dog, sit in the front of the restaurant and ask for drinking on the 'D' restaurant operated by Da-gu B (year 38, South). The Defendant used a d'D' restaurant as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant: (d) the Defendant entered the restaurant; and (d) the other customer; and (e) the Defendant d(s) the Defendant d(s) the other customer entered the restaurant; and (e) the Defendant d(s) the d'D’ restaurant; and (e) the Defendant d'C’s wife E (age 34;

2. At this time, the Defendant: (a) went back to the restaurant in which he was under the influence of alcohol and went into the hall; (b) Da 15 minutes of the 15 minutes of the garment, such as her opening, her arm’s length, and her loudly talks with the Defendant; and (c) at around 23:06 of the same day, C reported her to the police by her own, and re-explocing her at the above restaurant, “I will make a fluor of 15 minutes of the cafeteria, her death, and will not be held in the future; and (d) on the same day 23:55, the Defendant again found in the above restaurant for the foregoing reasons, “I am out of the cafeteria,” and “I am out of the cafeteria, she will leave the me a mick, she will leave the me again, and I will not be able to do with a duty of taxation.

"A 20-minute pedagogs, such as taking a bath, interfered with his restaurant business by leaving about 20 minutes."

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and E;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and the selection of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;