A. The Plaintiffs, following the vessels, leased each real estate listed in the separate sheet from the Defendant (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and used it for residential and agricultural purposes.

B. However, on September 23, 2009, F, who was appointed as the Defendant’s new knowledge, filed an application for reconciliation prior to the filing of a lawsuit with the court against the Plaintiffs on September 23, 2009, to the effect that “The rental period of each real estate of this case shall be two years in the future, and each real estate shall be removed and delivered upon the expiration of the lease period,” and the Plaintiffs did not comply with the claim that the right of lease should be guaranteed at least up to their own party, and thus, the instant case was concluded as

C. Since then, F prepared each document stating that "the defendant shall guarantee the right to lease of each of the real estate of this case to the plaintiffs, who are the official time of voluntary delivery of the plaintiffs or the plaintiffs' counter-party under the title of "Grgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgrgr's head office guidelines" (hereinafter referred to as "each of the instant documents") to the defendant upon termination of the price per party, the plaintiffs immediately remove the building and deliver each of the instant real estate of this case to the defendant," and proposed that the right to lease to the party of the plaintiffs shall be guaranteed as specified in the above letter, but the right to lease to the party of the plaintiffs shall be determined by the court's decision in form, and the plaintiffs shall comply with the prior settlement, trust the words of each of the instant documents and F, and received F's proposal.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs and the defendant present at this court on December 27, 2010, and "the defendant" as the court 2010.16 of this Court, from May 30, 2009 to December 26, 2011, the rental period for each of the real estate of this case is from May 30, 2009 to December 26, 201; the plaintiff A shall set the rental fee of the above period as KRW 1,350,000 for the plaintiff A; the plaintiff B shall be KRW 1,80,000 for the plaintiff; and the plaintiff C shall be leased as KRW 1,20,000 for the above rental period. The real estate of this case shall be restored to its original state on December 27, 2011.