At around 20:50 on April 7, 2018, the Defendant 2018 Goi-Ma1102, the Defendant expressed the victim D and her husband of the victim at “C” with a large interest of her husband, such as schep, schep, etc., and obstructed the victim’s main operation by force for a limited period of time, such as her husband of the victim D and her husband of the victim, and her husband of the victim.

"2019 Highest 1154" Defendant Gag operated by the victim F on February 16, 2018, the second floor of the building E in Gunsan-si around 01:00

In the main place, without any reason, the victim entered the victim as a guest, and without any reason, “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's bar business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1102"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case, report on the internal investigation, and report on the internal investigation (Attachment to moving pictures);

1. Photographs "2019 Highest 1154";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of cases;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and imprisonment, respectively;

1. Among concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act are four times the defendant had the same criminal records, and each of the crimes of this case has been committed during the same suspended execution period.

During the same period, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 8 million on August 4, 2017 due to interference with business, etc.

For repeated crimes, the defendant commits a second offense.