However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 23, 2013, around 15:00, the Defendant installed 20 game 20 games of “sea-to-sea-to-sea” on the second floor of the D-Si, Won-si, and thereafter provided multiple unspecified customers, including E, to use the said game machine, and exchanged the remaining points by calculating them as one won per point of the game and exchanging them in cash.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified to customers for their use, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of F and E;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 (the provision of a game product without classification) of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry Selection and Punishment, and Articles 44 (1) 2 and 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry (the fact of exchanging results acquired through the use of game products and the selection of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., reflectment of the period of crime, the fact that the period of crime is relatively short, the health and home environment, etc

1. Probationary crimes under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act;