A. The Plaintiff is a special corporation that performs industrial accident compensation insurance business entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

의령큰줄땡기기 보존회(이하 ‘보존회’라 한다)는 산재보험법에 따른 산업재해보상보험의 가입자이고, A(이하 ‘피해자’라 한다)은 보존회 소속 근로자이며, 피고는 B 5톤 트럭(이하 ‘가해차량’이라 한다)의 종합보험자이다.

나. C는 2014. 5. 9. 11:30경 경남 의령군 의령읍 의병의 날 행사 중 하나인 의령큰줄땡기기에 필요한 새끼줄을 가해차량 적재함에 싣고 그 위에 피해자를 탑승하게 한 후 의령읍 소재 공단교 아래를 진행하던 중 공단교 하단 콘크리트 구조물에 새끼줄이 끼어 뒤쪽으로 무너져 내려오면서 새끼줄 위에 앉아 있던 피해자를 덮쳤고, 피해자는 그로 인하여 흉추 척수 손상, 척수손상으로 인한 양하지 마비, 배뇨/배변 장해 등의 상해를 입었다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

By April 10, 2017, the Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident, and paid the victim KRW 32,311,360 of temporary layoff benefits, KRW 14,605,950 of the injury and disease pension, KRW 91,261,914 of disability benefits (converted amount), health care benefit219,246,820 of the medical care benefit, KRW 2,470,50 of the nursing benefits, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 5, 6 evidence, Eul evidence 1 through 3, 5 evidence and video (including branch numbers in case of additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination on the occurrence and scope of liability for damages

A. According to the above fact of recognition of liability for damages, the accident of this case occurred due to a mistake that C, the driver of a sea-going vehicle, failed to pay due attention to driving a sea-going vehicle. Thus, the defendant, the insurer of a sea-going vehicle, is the victim due to the accident of this case.