Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On the other hand, the defendant was judged to have committed suicide within the military unit in which his husband had been living in the military for about 50 years before his husband, but was found to have been in the family of the victim in order to talk that he had not committed suicide to the husband of the victim who was the husband of the military unit at the time.

Around 11:00 on January 6, 2018, the Defendant was demanded to leave the apartment because, on the above grounds, the victim C (78 years of age, women) who was located in the area B of the branch of Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, D apartment E, which is a residence of the victim C (78 years of age, women), the husband was living in the front corridor E, the husband's personal belongings was changed, and the husband's personal belongings was changed, and the victim of the sound will not leave the apartment.

Around 11:20 on the same day, the defendant did not respond to the request of the victim for the withdrawal of the victim without being dispatched to the police officer by the report of the victim and again recommended the withdrawal of the victim, and the victim's husband will continue to appear before the door of the victim's house, and the victim's demand for withdrawal was refused without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. A witness F and C’s legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 319 (2) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the confinement of a workhouse in the workhouse (based on evidence), 70(1), and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter “the Act”) : (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant was living in an apartment building of the victim; (c) the Defendant demanded the victim to have met her husband with her husband; and (d) the Defendant did not comply with the request to leave from the victim and her family; and (c) the Defendant continued to commit an act of breaking the victim for about 2 hours without complying with the request, even if the police officer dispatched to the 112 report received the request to leave from the victim.

This act of the defendant at the entrance of the entrance of the apartment is a violation of de facto peace in the residence of a person, and constitutes the crime of refusing to leave.

Defendant

(b)an act;