beta
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.08.19 2020고정252

특수협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of BMW car.

On October 19, 2019, at around 14:53, the Defendant, along with the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the 43-lanes of the national highway 43 located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, the Defendant, when changing the course to a one-lane, was driving the victim C(34 years old) driving at the later bank, and was frightening to the victim by using the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant, while proceeding by changing the course into one lane as above, was speeded three consecutive times, despite the absence of any circumstance that could reduce the speed of the suddenly in the front section, followed by the rapid radars, and followed by the 4th rapid radars, and followed the sudden speeded by the victim following the vehicle, and led the victim following the vehicle to make a sudden operation in order to avoid collision.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using a dangerous vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. As a result of viewing the Defendant’s partial statement of the witness C’s legal statement, the Defendant claimed that the Defendant’s wife, who was on the back seat, fluencing the victim’s walked sound, began to sound the victim’s vehicle, and that the Defendant’s wife, who was on the back seat, flucing the victim’s walked at a speed that the Defendant’s denial rate would reduce the wind, and that there was no intention of intimidation.

However, according to the black image, the defendant can be found to have driven as stated in the facts constituting the crime, and ① the defendant, while proceeding with the two-lane vehicle, followed the second bring vehicle, and the victim who followed the defendant's vehicle, followed the defendant's vehicle, was able to take more than twice the bring vehicle, but the defendant followed the two consecutive brings, and ② the defendant was proceeding under the speed of the Gap immediately following the fourth bring vehicle.