2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and that his mistake is divided, and the amount of damage is not significant.

However, the Defendant has been sentenced to a fine, suspension of execution, and punishment for a total time and has the record of being sentenced several times as well as the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the period of repeated crime due to the same kind of crime, the Defendant did not recover from damage and did not agree with the victim, and there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of the instant case, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, shall not be deemed to be unfair because the lower court’s punishment is too large, in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.