However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the plaintiff in Seoul High Court Decision 2016Na2016Na204583 in the case where the invalidity of the resolution at the general assembly and the absence of a president.

The defendant around 10:10 on April 21, 2017, at the center of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu, 157, and at the civil court No. 407, Seo-gu Seoul High Court, the defendant's three presiding judge in civil law is dismissed in both the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's appeal.

"I am to see whether it was a trial or not," or "I am to see the error of the judgment;

It is also a country.

C. The poor gue is the gue.

‘Along with the word knife knife knife knife 5cm in length)’, the word knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife B practical officers

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. B written statements;

1. Investigation report (CCTV analysis);

1. The occurrence of acts of self-harm in the Seoul High Court and the evidence and photographing photographs thereof;

1. A knife knife knife;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 138 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Social Service Order (hereinafter “Interference with the performance of official duties”) means an act of notifying harm and injury for the purpose of causing fear to the other party, and the content of harm and injury notified should be taken into account various circumstances as at the time of the act, such as the developments, surrounding circumstances at the time of the act, the offender’s inclination, degree of friendship with the other party, and mutual relation between the offender and the other party, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do15986, Feb. 10, 2011). The Defendant is going to go to the legal direction in order to raise an objection against the conclusion of the judgment and to raise an objection thereto.