When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 11:40 on January 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) placed food of the first floor 1st century in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si B; (b) made use of a gap in which the caution of the victim D was neglected; and (c) placed food, such as canns of 28,000 won at the market price owned by the victim, which was located there, in such a place, into the Defendant’s cream, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to receipts, damaged objects photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Since the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the sentencing guidelines do not apply to the recruitment of the workhouses.

Considering the fact that there was a history of punishment for the same criminal record and several times, that the defendant is against the confession of the crime of this case, that the amount of damage is a small amount, that is the living penalty, and that the damaged goods were returned, and that the victim was the wife against the defendant, etc.