2. In light of the following facts: (a) although the judgment was based on: (b) the Defendant actively cooperates in the investigative process so that he/she can arrest his/her accomplice, he/she is recognized that the same criminal records of the Defendant exceed 10 times; (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it even though he/she was a repeated crime period based on the previous and previous charges; and (d) the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by taking into account the fact that the Defendant has already cooperation in the investigative process; and (e) other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive, means, and consequence, the sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.