When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant, who operates the key repair point of the apartment entrance of another person, was anticipated to have a strong key into the key hole of the apartment entrance of another person, and the resident expected to request the defendant to repair the key at the defendant's shop, so that the defendant is willing to bring a strong key into the key hole of the apartment entrance of another person to harm its utility.

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) up to 18:44 on April 12, 2017, up to 301, injected the strong key hole in the front door key hole in which the victim D is residing, and (b) prevented the strong key hole from entering the key hole, thereby impairing the utility for the repair cost to be equivalent to KRW 50,000,000; and (c) destroyed the guns that require the repair cost of KRW 2.70,000,000 in five times, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. Report on internal investigation (investigation into such crimes) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (Investigation into victims);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the instant crime is very bad, the punishment as ordered by the Defendant shall be determined in light of the fact that the Defendant compensates the victim G and F for damages and that the agreement was submitted to this court by a smooth agreement.