However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On July 16, 2014, at around 21:50, the Defendant: (a) was drunk in front of a restaurant with no knowledge of the trade name located in the Busan Dong-dong, Busan, and was under the influence of a victim C (the age of 58) in a commercial taxi driven by the victim C (the age of 58) and was under the influence of the Defendant; (b) the Defendant reported that the Defendant stopped the taxi on the street of the E Public Security Center located in the Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and then stopped the taxi to the police in order to make the victim feel a threat of the Defendant’s operation; and (c) reported that the Defendant stopped the taxi on the road in front of the E Public Security Center located in D in the Busan, and brought the victim’s knife with the knife with the fage of the victim.

As a result, the defendant suffered from the victim about seven days of treatment, such as gympium and gympium, etc.

2. The Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties, F, and G’s injury to the performance of official duties, and the date and time, time, and place specified in the preceding paragraph, and the slope F belonging to the Busan East Police Station E Zone of the Busan East Police Station, which received a report from the Defendant, arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender for the crimes stated in the preceding paragraph, and took the said F F’s face into the back seat of the patrol vehicle by force by the police officers, and then opened the door of the patrol vehicle by launching the above G’s face in order to close the door of the patrol vehicle by hand, and cut off the above F’s right bucks that were sitting back by the Defendant.

After continuing to go to the E District Unit located in Busan Dong-gu, the Defendant tried to go to C who made a statement to the police officer about the fact that the Defendant was damaged by the Defendant, but he was removed from the above G, and he left the said G's hand-out posts.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties in the above F and the above G criminal investigation, which is the police officer, and at the same time, caused the buckbucks where the treatment days cannot be known to the above F.