The Defendant, who is engaged in the construction business, was unable to carry out the business due to the lack of construction cost due to the lack of the Jung-gu Seoul metropolitan apartment (hereinafter “instant construction”) that had been promoted from several years before August 2012, and was paying money to the victim D (73 years of age) as if he were able to fully repay the money when the construction was being carried out and completed without any problem.

Defendant,

1. On August 10, 2012, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 204 Dong 508, the victim’s female life in F, “I will repay the Plaintiff upon completion of the instant construction work.”

However, the instant construction project was not carried out for several years due to the lack of funds of the owner, and it was impossible to complete the construction in the future, and it was impossible to complete the construction in the future, and it was impossible to complete the construction project in the form of cancellation of the construction permit by the Jung-gu Office of Daejeon Metropolitan City, the competent authority as of October 26, 201.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 15 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative (H) account under the name of the Defendant;

2. On August 30, 2012, on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle located in Kimpo-si I, Kimpo-si, the victim made a false statement to the effect that “I would lend money to the Corporation after completion of construction” to the victim as described in the preceding paragraph, and received KRW 25 million from the victim.

3. On January 21, 2013, at the “J-cafeteria” located in Kimpo-si I, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

If the Corporation lends 50 million won to the victim as described in subsection (1) above, it shall complete all of the loan up to the previous loan as completed by the Corporation.

‘Falsely speaking, the victim received KRW 50 million from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of KRW 90 million to the victim by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;