However, for the defendant B, C, D, E, and F, the date this decision became final and conclusive.

Defendants, along with L, M, etc., exercise overall control over the operation of the gambling place in Gangnam-gu Seoul NN building A 402, Defendant B, and Defendant A. Defendant C, who had exchanged chips equivalent to cash with the face value and deducted and settled the chips obtained as a result of gambling, thereby managing gambling funds. Defendant E and Defendant F, by preparing for vehicles, are in the “clater” referring to the “clater” referring to the act of gambling in order for gambling to go through gambling outside of the gambling place, and Defendant D conspired to go through gambling in order to return the card to the gambling.

From July 26, 2013 to August 15:40, 2013, the Defendants opened the said card and opened the chips to make the chips from KRW 30,000 to KRW 30,000,000. From July 26, 2013 to August 8, 2013, the Defendants installed a chip to play games and prepared 312 gambling and mixing the cards with 312 card, and then opened the said card with chip to make the chips from KRW 30,00 to KRW 30,00.0.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect examination protocol prepared by the prosecution Nos. 2, 3 and 4 against Defendant A;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning P, Q and R;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol on S, T, U,O, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AH, AH, AJ, AK, AL, AM, and N;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Application of investigation reports (including details of phone calls sent out by suspects), investigation reports (limited to attachment of documents on transactions of deposits and withdrawals to the accounts of community credit cooperatives under the name ofM, and verification of the scale of gold), and statutes;

1. Defendants: Article 247 of the Criminal Act and Article 247 of the Criminal Act.