공무집행방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Experience] On December 20, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a special injury in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon on December 20, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 28, 2017.
[Criminal facts]
1. On July 15, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties is under way to escape after receiving 112 reports from C, C, C, and doing so, to E, a police officer belonging to the D, the Singu Police Station D, the Singuing Police Station, who started the service.
In other words, the court should be present at the trial, so it is called ", however, if the trial is held, it shall be improved as soon as possible by the E.
There is no special reason such as the current number of times, and there is no way to help the low-income bracket.
In the event of hearing the word “,” the head of the Dong, Doz., Doz., Doz., Doz., the police of the Republic of Korea, Doz.
As the head of the party miscellaneous, the head of the party miscellaneous, flab, and booms, the back door of the patrol car was sold by drinking at several times, and the head of the patrol car was flabed three times with both hand and hand flab.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
2. The Defendant who attempted to damage goods for public use, at the same time, at the same place as the foregoing in the preceding paragraph, assaulted the above E, and, at the same time and place, attempted to cause damage to the patrol vehicle by the police.
cb. Sheb. Sheb. Sheb. Sheb. Sheb. Sheb.
‘Abrutial, D'(F patrol 32) was taken off five times by drinking, but the latter part of D's 32 F patrol car was arrested from the above E, etc., so it did not bring about an attempted crime.
Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to damage the patrol car, which is a thing used by public offices, but did not bring about the intent and did not commit the attempted crime.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Each report on investigation;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (Confirmation of whether a suspect A has become final and conclusive judgment);
1. Criminal facts;