2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff, prior to the merger, is the owner of the area of 413 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and the area of 16 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”). In addition, the Plaintiff is the owner of the instant land (hereinafter “each of the instant land”).

On September 10, 2019, after the determination of the officially assessed individual land price as follows, each of the instant land was changed to the land category of which is 429 square meters in Pyeongtaek-gun, Gangwon-do.

B. On May 31, 2019, the Defendant determined and publicly announced the officially assessed individual land price as of January 1, 2019 on each of the instant land as KRW 28,300 per square meter, following the procedures for the selection of comparative standard land and the investigation of land characteristics.

(hereinafter referred to as “each disposition of this case”). The comparison standard is the Gangwon-do Pyeongtaek-gun F (hereinafter referred to as “instant comparative standard”) and the results of the investigation of the characteristics of each land of this case are as follows.

1) The former production and management of the first land of this case - the former production and management of the land of this case - the former production and management of the second land of this case - the former and other acute slope-type 3, the former production management of the comparative standard land of this case - the former production management of the present 3rd slope type - the former production management of the instant comparative standard land of this case -

C. On June 14, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a written objection with the Defendant on each of the instant dispositions that the officially assessed individual land price of each of the instant land was too high, but the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the ground that the publicly assessed individual land price of each of the instant lands was “a balance between the characteristics of the land, the selection of standard land comparison with the characteristics of the land, the adjacent land price, and the old land price.”

On September 24, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the Defendant seeking revocation of each of the instant dispositions, and the Gangwon-do Administrative Appeals Commission dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on January 13, 2020.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 2 to 9, each video and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows.