However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 4, 2018, Defendant A tried to occupy the road from the new tent distance near C building at Silung-si around 20:15 on May 4, 2018, and “A” on the road.

'' He reported the content 112 and sent to the scene by the police officer E (44) assigned to the Singuing Police Station D (S) Police Station D (S) who was asked the above E to move to the road and to a safe place, the above E “I am to this sar in which I am sar?” The chest of F F (25 years old) who was assigned to the same police box where I am sar in which I am sar and pushed the Defendant at one time and pushed down the chest of the above E in his hand, and controlled the Defendant at one time.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. At the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant discovered that the police officers arrested the above Party A, who is the husband of the Defendant, as a flagrant offender, with the suspicion of interference with the performance of official duties, and committed assault, such as flap, etc. of the above F’s left hand part of the above F’s right bridge, which was flaped to the police officer G (28 taxes) who belongs to the police box at Sinung-gu Police Station D (28 Does) by hand, and flap, etc. of G’s hand, which was flaped by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136(1) of the relevant Criminal Act on criminal facts

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Trade Union (the Defendants)

1. Selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Determination of imprisonment in consideration of the same kind of power

B. Defendant B: Selection of a fine in consideration of the occurrence of the instant case, such as the first offender, and the fact that Defendant A, her husband, was arrested to a police officer and appears to have occurred in the process of preventing him from being arrested.

1. Attraction of a workhouse (Defendant B) Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act