When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 00:05 on December 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) expressed a large voice, such as “D” entertainment tavern operated by the victim C (the 55 years of age) in Osan City B, on the ground that there was a large drinking value; (b) expressed the victim’s desire with a large voice, such as “I would have to calculate the fee for why he would be why he would have caused; and (c) I would like to walk the scam without paying the drinking value to other customers, and interfere with the victim’s entertainment tavern business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 40 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a CCTV image closure photograph;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are both recognized and reflected by the Defendant. The act of obstructing the business by force was calculated as a bad and drinking value, and the victim expressed his/her intent that the Defendant is not subject to punishment at the investigation stage.

In addition, a fine for summary order shall be reduced somewhat by taking into account various circumstances.