손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On July 27, 2016, at around 18:50, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition (the filing number E; hereinafter “instant civil petition”) with the same content as that indicated in the attached Form as “D,” with access to C.
B. The instant civil petition received by electronic means contains the Plaintiff’s personal information, such as the applicant’s address and name, e-mail address, mobile phone number, etc. as the basic information prior to the entry of the content of the application, and additional information include the following: (a) the method of notifying the civil petition response and the method of notifying the progress by e-mail; (b) the method of checking the civil petition is a security type (other than the log, verifying the application number after entry); (c) the selective matter that is non-shared is entered; (d) the details of the civil petition and the details of the response can be provided to other administrative agencies to be reflected in the civil petition affairs or the government policy; and (e) the notification that the civil petition and the details of the response can be provided as a civil petition case to the public
(c)
Around 08:42 on July 28, 2016, the Defendant’s audit officer in charge of the instant civil petition handled the applicant information in a closed manner, and printed out a written civil petition consultation with the Plaintiff’s name to the F (hereinafter “employee in charge of the Defendant”) who is an employee in charge of the Defendant’s welfare department for the disabled, and provided the civil petition to the Defendant’s welfare department for the disabled. The employee in charge of the Defendant, around 08:37, August 2, 2016, would request C to improve the system in the “FF’s public document” to expand support for the class 1 disabled.
“ Being aware of the result of the civil petition treatment.”
(d)
The plaintiff shall investigate the satisfaction of the civil petition with the purport that the process of treating the civil petition by the employees in charge of the defendant is a very dissatisfaction and that the civil petition is infinite, unfaith, and the civil petition was not resolved.