소유권이전등기
1. The defendant is 1.5% of each of the 1,330.6 square meters of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F 1,330.6 square meters to the plaintiff net A's litigant B, C, D, and E.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On August 8, 1963, Seoul, which was owned by the Defendant, incorporated the 6th 6th flux of G forest land (1,380 square meters, hereinafter “instant forest land”) into the H land readjustment project district, and divided the instant forest into the 36th flux of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu and J (hereinafter “each land after division”).
B. The Defendant, from around 1964 to 1966, possessed a house on each land after dividing the forest of this case from the point where the forest of this case was divided, and sold each land to the occupant of the pertinent land after receiving an application for purchase of state property from the occupant who resided in the relevant land.
C. Upon the completion of the said land readjustment project on October 5, 1967, the Seoul Metropolitan Government issued a land substitution disposition with regard to the sum of 1,380 square meters in total of 36 parcels of land and five parcels of land adjacent thereto (42 square meters in K site, L, 44 square meters in L, 37, 8 square meters in N, 11 square meters in N, 11 square meters in total, 1,522 square meters in total, including the forest of this case and five parcels of land adjacent thereto, and 1,52 square meters in total (hereinafter “instant co-owned land”). < Amended by Act No. 1,5220, Oct. 5, 1967; Act No. 2,066.1 square meters in total (hereinafter “co-owned land after replotting”).
At this time, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government AA Forest Land 57 square meters (hereinafter “before land substitution”) was replaced by the land of 103.5 square meters (the same location as the land before land substitution; hereinafter “instant land”) in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
The name-free person, who owned and resided on the land before replotting, entered into a sales contract for state property to purchase the land before replotting with the defendant, and paid the price in full to the defendant.
However, since the subdivision registration on the forest of this case has not yet been completed, the defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer as to 57/1380 of the forest of this case among the forest of this case to the land purchaser prior to replotting.
After May 1, 1979.