집행판결 청구의 소
1. 원고와 피고 사이에 일본국 미토가정재판소 2016년 가호(家ホ) 제10호 혼인무효 확인청구...
피고는 원고를 상대로, 원고 및 피고가 2015. 2. 26. 미토시장에게 혼인신고를 하였으나 위 혼인신고는 원고와 피고의 혼인의사를 결여한 것이어서 무효라는 이유로 일본국 미토가정재판소에 혼인무효확인을 청구하였고, 위 재판소는 2016. 12. 16. 2016년 가호(家ホ) 제10호로 원고와 피고 사이의 혼인이 무효임을 확인한다는 판결을 하였으며, 위 판결이 확정된 사실은 민사소송법 제150조 제3항에 의하여 피고가 자백한 것으로 간주된다.
Japan's judgment does not violate the good customs and other social order of the Republic of Korea. In the above case, the defendant received a complaint or a document equivalent thereto, and received a notice of date or order by service by public notice or similar service in the above case.
There is no data to acknowledge that Japan has not lawfully served this, and furthermore, there is a provision on the same purport as the Civil Procedure Act of Korea concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and it is considered that the conditions for Japan to enforce Korean judgments are the same as Korea, and eventually there is a mutual guarantee between Korea and Japan to recognize the validity of each other's judgments.
Thus, the above judgment of Japan is valid and compulsory execution is permitted in Korea as it satisfies all the conditions of Article 217 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking a judgment of execution of the above judgment is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.