전자금융거래법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On January 2013, the Defendant: (a) paid KRW 100,00 to E even if a person was not allowed to acquire the means of access in front of the D Teaching Institutes located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu; and (b) received one passbook of the E Agricultural Cooperative Account (F) and one cash card, and acquired the means of access.
2. The Defendant consistently asserts that there was no receipt of passbook, cash card, etc. under E from the police to this court, and denies the instant facts charged.
In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the following facts are acknowledged. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor to prove the guilty of the facts charged in this case is the witness E’s statement in this court and the statement prepared by E in the investigative agency.
E entered in the written statement prepared by the Prosecutor’s Office, “On January 9, 2013, by creating a passbook for the National Bank, an Internet banking card, a cash card, and an amount of KRW 00,000,000.” In addition, after one week, A again made the passbook for the use of the passbook, thereby creating the agricultural bank, cash card, physical card, and passbook, and received KRW 10,000,000,000. The national bank closed the suspension of indictment and made the agricultural bank passbook one week after the suspension of indictment.”