Examining the record, the lower court is justifiable to have rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the mental and physical disorder based on its stated reasoning.

There is no error of incomplete deliberation as to mental disorder.

In addition, the argument that the judgment of the court below is erroneous in incomplete deliberation on the sentencing conditions is the argument of unfair sentencing.

However, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.