2. Determination

A. The following facts and circumstances are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below.

1) From the investigative agency to the original trial, the victim consistently stated the following details. The victim consistently made the victim’s desire in the drinking house, and the victim dumbling out, and the victim dumbling out of the drinking house. After about one minute, the victim dumbling out of the drinking house, and the defendant dumbling the victim again dumbing the drinking, and dumbing the victim again dumbing the drinking. The victim dumbing out of the drinking house, the victim dumbing the dumbing of the defendant, the defendant dumbing the dumbing of the defendant, and the victim dumbing the defendant's dumbage. The victim was hospitalized on two occasions by the defendant on September 23, 2013, and the victim was hospitalized at the right side of the defendant on two occasions, and the victim was hospitalized from the J Hospital to the above hospital open to the hospital on 25th of 2013.

In addition, on October 5, 2013, the victim was issued a written diagnosis of injury at the J Hospital for about 28 days in need of treatment, the right-hand alley, the right-hand alley, and the long-standing an open drinking house.

As such, the part of the victim who received the medical treatment and received the medical treatment is consistent with the part that the victim stated that he/she was the victim from the defendant.

Although the victim was provided with medical treatment at a hospital after the date of the instant case, the victim’s statement that the date of the instant case was around 22:0 on Saturdays and that the next day was Sundays and that the hospital was provided with medical treatment on the day of the instant case is sufficiently acceptable.

3. Meanwhile, the defendant is the defendant.