However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 3, 2017, the Defendant driven a sports cargo vehicle B in the state of alcohol with approximately KRW 0.067% of alcohol content from around 1k to around the 664 UN at the construction site of the same Eup from the road in front of the new apartment 170-3 new apartment in the Eup-Myeon, an Eup-Myeon from May 3, 2017 to the river in front of the construction site of the Eup-Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection: A favorable circumstance, such as the fact that a person has been punished several times of a fine due to drinking or non-licensed driving, etc.: The confession, reflectivity, and the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding a fine, and the fact that the numerical value of this case drinking is not relatively high: A sentence imposed on the defendant's age, family relation, criminal background, etc.: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months, suspension of execution for two years, and for orders