However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 28, 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim C’s house located in the building D at Yangju-si, stating, “The victim will pay two additional interest if he/she lends money to the victim as he/she is required to enter into a contract for and work for confidentiality when he/she takes bath.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the loans that he/she received as security even if he/she borrowed money from the victim because his/her own debt becomes worse to the extent that he/she could not repay the loans.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received from the victim the delivery of KRW 10 million as the borrowed money from the victim.

2. Around June 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F, “In the house of the victim F of the G building 1 B02 at Dongducheon-si, Dongyang-si, that “When the victim entered into a contract and entered into an IB with an IB, the victim, who would be able to pay interest on two occasions if the deposit is required.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the loans that he/she received as security even if he/she borrowed money from the victim because his/her own debt becomes worse to the extent that he/she could not repay the loans.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 5.5 million won from the victim, namely, a delivery from the victim as a loan.

3. On July 3, 2008, the Defendant against the victim J made a false statement to the victim’s home of the victim J in Dong-gu, Dong-do, 202 Dong-dong 202 402, stating, “The victim’s wife and son are hospitalized in the hospital by five persons who are in traffic accidents, and the agreement with the victim is needed.”

However, the defendant's father and children did not pay a traffic accident, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay money even if he borrowed money from the victim because his own debt becomes worse to the extent that he could not pay the loan that he received as security.