When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The Defendant, from March 7, 2015 to December 12, 2015, operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "C" as referred to in Article 1003 of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B from around March 7, 2015, received KRW 170,00 from the unspecified male customers who reported and contacted with the Internet amusement information site, and had female employees, such as D, employed by the Defendant, do sexual intercourse with the above male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative sentence of imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of a fine (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Intermediation of types 2 (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts by giving and receiving, etc.) (one to three years) in the area of aggravation (one year) (one year and three years), advertisement character or high radio wave of the types of commercial sex acts subject to 19 years of age or older;

2. The specific grounds for sentencing are small in size, the operating period does not have the same kind of force per week, and it is so decided as per Disposition on the same grounds as the erroneous one recognizes and reflects the error.