However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. A special intimidation: (a) around 10:00 on June 23, 2019, the Defendant: (b) 10:00, the victim C (the 63 years of age) who was her wife in the Defendant’s residence located in Dong-dong, and her boomed the Defendant and her boomed the Defendant, who was her boomed, and was her boomed by being her boomed, and discarded the Defendant; (c) the victim was frighted and her boomed; (d) the victim was frighted and her boomed, and the victim was opened with a brush, and the victim was frighted, and the victim was her b

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 1, destroyed the victim’s non-repairing car owned by the Defendant’s son, where the said C was on board, and tried to flee by driving the Defendant’s frighting car owned by the victim of the son, and left the frighting fright, which is a dangerous object on the fright for the escape of the frighting party, (3 cm in diameter, 147 cm in total length) and damaged the victim’s non-repair of the frighting car by driving the frighting car in front of the frighting party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A list of reports on occurrence (special intimidation, special destruction and damage) and 112 reported cases;

1. Criminal scene and photographs of objects used for committing the crime;

1. Application of the register of automobiles statutes

1. Relevant Article 284, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence is not very good for the Defendant to commit a crime, such as displaying the improvement of the victim, which is a dangerous object, threatening the victim; and (b)

(b).