On October 24, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor in the Seoul Northern District Court due to night residence intrusion theft, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 12, 2018.

1. From July 13, 2018, around 05:10 on July 13, 2018, the Defendant stolen the victim B by putting it out in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office of Guarding the building C, and putting it out for a test color, etc., which contains a quantity equivalent to KRW 50,000,000, market price of which the victim temporarily set out.

2. On July 13, 2018, around 06:26, the Defendant stolen the victim D’s thief, on board the electric wheelchairs equivalent to KRW 2.6 million in the market value where the victim parked in the E-house underground parking lot in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

3. On July 13, 2018, around 07:01, the Defendant thefted the victim F and G, at the fourth floor H department office of the Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, about 179, the victim F, and at the victim F, at the victim F’s market price equivalent to KRW 50,00,00, KRW 15,000, KRW 179.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of B, D, and F;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment of CCTV photographs related to criminal administration) and a report on internal investigation (the counter party of the victim and internal investigation at the site);

1. Previous convictions indicated in the Supreme Court Decision: Search of cases and judgments of the Supreme Court, investigation reports, reference to criminal records, and application of statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the sentence shall be imposed on the defendant, taking into account the fact that there is a history of punishment several times for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes, and that the damage has not been recovered at all, taking into account the fact that the defendant is recognized and against whom the crime is committed, and that the defendant is judged at the same time as for night, night, intrusion upon residence, theft, etc., when the judgment becomes final and conclusive