2. It is recognized that the defendant's wrong recognition of his or her mistake reflects his or her wrongness.

However, the act of arranging sexual traffic is not highly harmful to the society by commercializing women's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and requires strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and to establish a sound sexual culture. The defendant is punished for the same kind of crime, the defendant actively assisted sexual traffic through Internet advertisement, etc., and the so-called "bol president" was employed by the so-called "bol president" to enter into a lease contract in his name and let them carry out a business in the investigation agency, etc. After committing the crime, it is not good that the defendant's acquisition profit seems to be significant in light of the size and period of the sexual traffic business establishment of this case. In addition, considering the defendant's age, sex, occupation and environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime of this case, the punishment of the court below is unfair by taking into account all the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.