강제추행
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is between the victim B (the family name, the female, the age of 19) and the first accident.
At around 01:30 on April 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) had drunked, and had been drinking in front of the D community service center located in the Gunsan City, Sinsan-si; (b) had the Defendant talked about “Iddi, Idddi, Iddi?” with the phrase “Iddi?, Iddi??”
The Defendant asked the victim to be a convenience store together with the convenience store, and then purchased and returned to the E-mail store in the vicinity of the victim, the Defendant called "I have a flue flue fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe f.
Although the Defendant said that the victim “the same beer” was the victim in the said car, the victim refused to work and took a phone call from the victim’s cell phone, etc. immediately left the same form, such as the victim’s expression “provokinging off,” and took the victim’s cell phone into the back seat, leaving the victim’s cell phone into the back seat, leaving the victim’s cell phone into the back seat, leaving the victim’s cell phone into the back seat, and making the victim resisting the victim’s body, leaving the victim’s chest back, and putting his hand into the victim’s clothes, thereby committing an indecent act by coercioning the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B
1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed against Order to attend lectures;
1. The reason for sentencing under the main sentence of Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse against whom an employment restriction order is placed is that the criminal investigation agency denies the crime, but this court has reached