When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2018. 12. 7. 07:40경 서울 관악구 B 호텔 주차장에서 112신고를 받고 그곳에 출동한 서울관악경찰서 C지구대 소속 경장 D, 경위 E가 112신고자로부터 신고경위 등을 청취하고 있자 아무 이유 없이 경장 D에게 다가가서 ‘씹할’이라고 욕을 하면서 몸을 밀치고 손을 잡아당기는 등 계속하여 싸움을 걸었고, 이에 위 E가 휴대전화기를 꺼내어 그 모습을 녹화하기 시작하자 갑자기 그에게 달려들어 “나한테 집에 가라는 말을 하지 말라고 이 씹새끼야”라고 고함을 지르며 손으로 그의 어깨를 밀치고, 이를 제지하려는 위 D에게 “경찰은 좆밥이니 때릴 수 있지”, “우리 아버지가 서장인대 너희들은 시다바리니까 좃됐어”라고 고함을 지르며 손으로 그의 목을 밀쳤다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and the protection of people's physical property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of D or E;

1. Application of the F’s written statement of reference to statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the ordinary concurrent crimes (a punishment imposed for the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties against D with heavier concurrent crimes);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Based on the grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as above.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant is the first offender, and the investigative agency shows an attitude against the crime of this case.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.