소유권말소등기
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant is revoked.
2. The plaintiff corresponding to the above revocation part is the defendant C.
1. The reasons why this Court stated in this part of the underlying facts are excluded from the parts added and used as follows, the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance that “1. Basic facts are identical to the part of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, they are included in summary under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
A list in the column of No. 4 and No. 19 of the Republic of Korea
1. The term “registered real estate” shall be as follows:
1. It shall be registered in the form of "one-one-one percent equity interest in real estate";
The following matters shall be added to Chapter 9 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology No. 4:
E. 1) On June 8, 2017, the Plaintiff’s proceeding with related civil litigation, etc. No. 4.
5. The registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 26, 2003 under the name of the Plaintiff as of February 13, 2003 with respect to the real estate located near the real estate and each of the above above-ground buildings located near the Seoul Central ditch-gu N, Seoul Central District, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on the ground of sale as of May 16, 2005 under the name of the O (the spouse of Q Q who is the South-dong of the network E) on June 24, 2005, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on December 31, 2012 under the name of the Defendant C, again on November 22, 2012.
The Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court 2017Gahap539061) filed a lawsuit seeking the implementation of the ownership transfer registration procedure on the grounds of the restoration of title.
The cause of the claim is that “each of the above real estate was donated by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff and owned by the Plaintiff.” Since the registration of ownership transfer was completed in sequence in the name of O and Defendant C against the Plaintiff’s will, the registration of ownership transfer in the above Defendant’s name was invalid.”
2) On May 30, 2019, the above court rendered a judgment accepting the Plaintiff’s claim. The above judgment rendered a judgment accepting the Plaintiff’s claim. Each of the above real estate held in title trust (title trust) with the network D, and the registration of transfer of ownership in the Plaintiff’s name is the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the actual right holder of the real
Although it is null and void in accordance with the main sentence of Article IV(2), it shall be.