A. The Defendant asserts that the punishment imposed by the lower court (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor asserts that the above sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and that there is a family member to support.

However, the crime of arranging sexual traffic, etc. is a serious crime that harms the sound sexual culture and good morals and requires strict punishment. The period of the defendant's running establishment of the instant commercial sex acts is a long-term period of business operated by the defendant, and there are more than two business places operated, and the defendant is also obligated to pay the fine of the head of the branch office to the defendant in advance, etc. under the ground of the branch office. Considering the circumstances that there is no special circumstance or change that may newly be considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the sentence of the court below, and the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments and the records of the instant case, it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy or unreasonable.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.