However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Basic Facts] The Defendant registered the right to request the transfer of ownership from D around June 30, 2006 and completed a registration of the right to request the transfer of ownership (hereinafter “provisional registration of this case”) in the Defendant’s future around September 11, 2006, on the ground of the claim held by D with D, with respect to land located in F in Tong-si, Tong-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

On September 14, 2006, the victim C filed a claim against the defendant for the cancellation of the ownership transfer due to the cancellation of the speculative act with the Seoul Central District Court as the preserved right, and filed an application for the disposal of the gold price for the claim for cancellation of ownership transfer as to the provisional registration of this case. On September 20, 2006, the application for disposal of the gold price for the above claim for transfer of ownership was accepted, and on September 25, 2006, the registration of provisional disposition was completed around September 25, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the "provisional disposition of this case"). On November 2, 2006, the claim for cancellation of ownership transfer due to the cancellation of the registration before the registration was filed with the Seoul Central District Court for the lawsuit against the defendant for cancellation of the ownership transfer transfer registration due to the cancellation of the registration before the registration, and the conciliation was concluded between 50 and 50. < Amended by Act No. 8508, Apr. 17, 2007>

[2] On July 6, 2015, the Defendant, at a certified judicial scrivener office located in Seocho-gu, Seoul around July 6, 2015, concluded a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would divide 1/2 of the money and other consideration acquired by acquiring the ownership of the instant real estate by disposing of the instant real estate or by exercising the right to a provisional registration or by exercising the right to a provisional registration.”

However, even if the victim had cancelled the execution of the provisional disposition of this case, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to divide 1/2 of the money or other consideration acquired by the defendant by acquiring ownership of the real estate of this case or by exercising the right to make a provisional registration into the victim.

The defendant belongs to this.