If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 23, 2012, around 01:14, the Defendant entered the D main points of the operation of the Victim C B in Busan Seo-gu, Busan, with E and F, even if he drinks, knew, etc., he was unable to pay the price on a timely basis, thereby leading the victim as if he would pay the price on a normal basis even though he had no intent and ability to pay the price on a timely basis. The Defendant got profits from property by failing to pay the price on a sum of KRW 300,000,000, including the two weeks and the ten disease of each week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused, E, or F;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;