Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

[2013 High Court Decision 1817]

1. From June 10, 201 to 22:20 on June 10, 201, the Defendant was under influence of alcohol in the “Ecafeteria” operated by the victim D(S) of the victim D(S) in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si C.

The Defendant, without any reason, interfered with the general restaurant business of the said victim for about 20 minutes by force, by stating that the Defendant “Wook to die,” and speaking in a large lux, thereby obstructing the said victim’s general restaurant business.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by cutting off the defective telephone apparatus from the floor to the police, which was installed in a place where the employees of the Dong were installed in the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, and thereby damaging the property in the market value.

[2013 Gocheon-si 1998] On June 10, 201, the Defendant and F conspiredd to enter a “H restaurant” located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu Ga on drinking alcohol and food, and without any justifiable reason, Defendant A was off from the field, Defendant A went back to the restaurant, talked with sound, talked with a bath, and F was obstructed the business of a restaurant operated by the victim I (59 years of age and inn) by exercising the power of interfering with other customers by exercising the power of driving the parallel, thereby obstructing the business of a restaurant operated by the victim I (59 years of age and inn).

Summary of Evidence

[2013 High Court Decision 1817]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The photograph of the damaged telephone;

1. A report on investigation (verification report on the degree of damage and damage) (2013 high-level 1998);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the I Statement;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;