A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is that the crime of this case committed by the defendant was committed through the Internet marriage information company by deceiving or stealing money while approaching the victims who exceed the stirst of life through marriage, and then by deceiving or thefting money. In light of the plannedness, activeness, and the relationship with the victim, the crime was very poor in light of the nature of the crime, and there was no effort to recover damage even after the crime was committed, and there was no serious reflective attitude, and there was no history of punishment for the defendant. The defendant is old, there is no history of having been punished for the same crime, the number of crimes are many, but the amount acquired is relatively small, in full view of all the conditions of the sentencing in the records and arguments of this case, including other conditions favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's character and behavior, and the environment, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive or less appropriate.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, each of the appeals is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.