소유권이전등기
1. The Defendant indicated on the attached sheet No. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 7, 6. The Defendant indicated on the attached sheet No. 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 7, and 6.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 1967, Nonparty D sold to Nonparty E the Defendant’s father of the Defendant for KRW 169,410 of the FY 1,253 (hereinafter “instant land”), which was located on the ground, for the sale of approximately 50 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), which was located on the ground. However, the registration was transferred to the Defendant’s future, and was completed on May 29, 1967 by the Changwon District Court’s Busan District Court’s registration office, Busan District Court’s registry office, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Defendant’s future as of May 29, 1967.
B. The above D, for more than three years after selling the land before subdivision, moved to another cemetery on the land in question, and sold the land in question to the Plaintiff on October 20, 1970, and the Plaintiff occupied the land in question and occupied the fry trees on the land in question and on the G and H land owned by the Plaintiff in Gyeongnam-gun and Gyeongnam-gun, G and H.
C. Meanwhile, on August 22, 1990, the land of this case was divided from the land before the said subdivision, which was located in the Gyeongnam-gun, Busan-gun, the land of this case (hereinafter “instant land”).
In addition, the land in the dispute of this case gushes the morality from the land in this case owned by the other defendant as a boundary, and the part of the land in this case is cultivated and harvested by the defendant under the virtue that it is possible to clearly distinguish between the land in this case and the remaining land in this case from the land in this case.
E. On the land in the dispute in the instant case, there remain a lot of shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot shot s
F. The location and area of the land in the dispute of this case are 180 square meters in order to connect each point of the attached Table 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 22, 23, 24, 24, 7, 6, 5, and 17, among the land in this case.
[Grounds for recognition] Nos. 1 and 1.