약속어음대금
1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 60,000,000 and its KRW 20,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 20,000 from November 26, 2012, and KRW 20,000,00.
Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the arguments in subparagraphs 1 through 3, 3, and 4 above, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with essential daily items, etc., and the Plaintiff received a promissory note issued by each of the Defendant on the payment date of KRW 20,000 at par value on August 30, 2012, the payment date of KRW 20,000 at face value, KRW 20,000 at face value, KRW 25,000 on November 25, 2012, and the payment date of KRW 25,03 on January 25, 2013; and KRW 20,000 at face value on October 9, 2012. It can be recognized that the Defendant received a promissory note issued by each of the Defendant on February 25, 2013.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 60,00,000 as the price for each of the instant promissory notes, and damages for delay from the date following the due date of each of the respective promissory notes. As regards KRW 20,00,000 at par value on November 25, 2012, the due date for payment shall be from November 26, 2012, and KRW 20,000 at face value on January 25, 2013, the due date shall be from January 26, 2013 to February 25, 2013, the due date shall be from February 26, 2013 to the due date of payment of KRW 20,000 at face value on each of the instant promissory notes, each of which shall be paid at least 20% per annum from the date following the date of each of the instant notes, which shall be from February 26, 2013 to April 30, 2014.
(1) The Plaintiff filed a claim for the payment of a promissory note in the instant complaint, but it is deemed that the claim for the payment of the price of the goods was made, and the damages for delay was incurred from the due date of each promissory note, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is partially dismissed). Accordingly, in order to secure the payment of the goods to the Plaintiff, the Defendant settled the amount of each promissory note as being 100 million won to the Plaintiff, with respect to the right to collateral security (101, 102, 103, 109, 118, and 119, respectively, and the said amount is not repaid as the said right to collateral security.