절도등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[2012 Highest 2357]
1. On March 2012, 2012, the Defendant stolen the victim’s “EPC” (hereinafter “EPC”) operated on the 11st underground floor of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, with the victim’s CPU’s 11 market value equivalent to KRW 1,320,00,000, the victim’s CPU’s 11 market value equivalent to KRW 660,000,000, the 13 market value of the 11st disc, and the 650,000,000, total market value equivalent to KRW 550,000,000, each of the monitoring and computer main markets.
2. On July 23, 2012, at around 19:00, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim G, who is the team leader of the Seongdong-gu Seoul Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, stating that “In-house operates the instant PC but uses the PC at the instant PC, the Internet exclusive line used at the instant PC would be replaced from the Telecom to the SKS broadband.”
However, on December 1, 2011, the Defendant transferred the instant PC to D and was not an operator of the instant PC, and thus there was no intention or ability to lawfully replace the Internet exclusive line as agreed by the PC.
Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was transferred KRW 2,650,00 from the victim to the post office account under the name of the Defendant (H) around July 27, 2012 as the instant PC business support fund, and received KRW 459,150 from the Defendant to the bank account under the name of the Defendant (I) around July 30, 2012.
[2013 Highest 1503]
3. On April 6, 2013, around 13:50 on April 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim K’s Hub (communication connection) purchase on the Internet NNA JC website; and (b) made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would sell the JGS524 Hub three Hub 3,00,000, domestically in KRW 1800.”
However, even if the defendant received the above money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the hub.
The Defendant received 180,000 won from the victim to the post office account (L) in the name of the Defendant as a hub payment.
This is the defendant.