A. The Defendants deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant B shall be 1.2 million won and April 2016.

The contract date: The contract period on November 20, 2013: Two years (from November 20, 2013 to November 19, 2015): 3 million won per month: Defendant B did not specify the instant real estate after the contract period expires, and the rent on October 2, 2015 to December 12 and April 2016 was not paid.

Defendant C occupies the instant real estate.

The plaintiff notified the termination of the lease agreement to the defendant B, and notified the defendant C to leave.

【Ground for Recognition: Each entry of Evidence A 1 to 4】

2. The lease contract of this case on the Plaintiff’s assertion is terminated, the Defendant B is still in arrears, and the Plaintiff expressed his intention to terminate the lease contract, and the above lease contract is terminated.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to deliver real estate listed in the attached list, and Defendant B is obligated to pay 1.2 million won (total amount of overdue rent in arrears not paid until April 19, 2016) and 2.40,000 won per month from April 20, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the said real estate.

3. As to the Defendant C’s assertion, Defendant C paid in full that the car was closely sealed, paid 3 million won and the car to Defendant B, and extended the lease term to 5 years, and the deposit amount to 3 million won is refunded, or it is further used.

On the other hand, the above lease contract was lawfully terminated, and as long as the separate lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant C was not concluded, the possession of the defendant C is deemed to have no possessory right. Thus, the defendant C's assertion is without merit.

4. According to the conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is all filed.